I don’t know if this is controversial, but I’ve found after reading Emily Dickinson’s poetry in depth for the first time (besides the few poems in school/on Pinterest I’ve read) that I enjoy reading her letters more. Maybe I’ve gotten so used to Whitman’s long lines that I have been indoctrinated into liking longer lines more than short ones. The complex, image dense, and emotional letters make me feel like I’m “touching” Dickinson through the paper (Whitman style). Every word feels like it belongs, like every word was specially chosen after much deliberation. Yet, the words don’t feel forced. It doesn’t feel like the letters are trying too hard, or trying to be something they’re not. They’re also sooo image dense, from start to finish I am fully enthralled. It could also be the mildly taboo nature of reading someone’s personal writings. Who knows!
4 thoughts on “Letter-poem vs. Poem-poem”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
While I love Dickinson’s poetry I totally see where you’re coming from. I think reading her letters is essential in understanding her as a person which is necessary to understand her intentions behind each poem. I really enjoyed the personal nature of the letters; I love the way you worded feeling like you’re “touching Dickinson through the paper”, that’s a perfect way to put it. For me, having an insight into her relationships with others allowed me to envision her as an actual human being rather than just ‘Emily Dickinson, the poet’ if that makes sense. I also think the lyrical nature of her letters gives them a unique touch, making them more fun to read aloud and structurally analyze than typical letters.
I actually felt the opposite, though I get what you’re noticing. I tend to prefer Dickinson’s poems because they feel more intentionally shaped as artistic expressions, where the language is fully concentrated around that purpose. At the same time, I understand the appeal of the letters, especially since she blurs the boundary between correspondence and poetry so much that they can feel similar in style. The letters also carry a stronger sense of personality and context, which makes it easier to become invested in the relationships and moments behind the writing. Because of that, I can see why they might feel more engaging or immersive, even if they aren’t framed as poems. For me, though, that overlap just makes the poems stand out more, since they feel like the most deliberate and distilled version of the same voice.
I see your point, and after reading more of Dickinson’s poems, I see your point MORE. Her poems feel so deliberate, every word so carefully chosen and often occupying multiple meanings. While I still absolutely loved her poems, I really appreciate the intention behind her poetry the more I read.
I agree! I think the longer, Whitman-style letters also give more to “go” on if that makes sense. Because I am used to studying longer pieces of material, it is difficult and also unfamiliar to try to derive strong meaning from the shorter pieces. Also through the writing to which I am exposed more frequently, I prefer longer, more descriptive poems. Its preference shaped by familiarity, and I agree with you.