…I think I like Emily Dickinson better than Walt Whitman. Yes, yes, I know I was a diehard Whitmaniac at the beginning of this semester, I even got my blog username from one of his poems… but there’s something about Dickinson’s writing, both prose and poetry – and speaking of both, I love that they overlap, prosetry if you will – that captivates me so so so much. She sees the world in such a unique and beautiful way, simultaneously whimsical and authentic. It also might be because I see a bit of myself in her (ie, I’m projecting). Who knows. She’s a wonderful mystery.
Author Archives: praisedbethefathomlessuniverse aka luca
Last of Ebb, and Daylight Waning

I came across this particular poem while looking through Whitman’s manuscripts (this is the published version), and wanted to share it for those who may not have read it. I find its depiction of sorrow and loss, backdropped by the ocean, incredibly beautiful.
Whitman’s Perception of the Female Body
In section 5 of “I Sing the Body Electric,” we see Whitman praising the female form, even calling it divine – “The female contains all qualities and tempers them/She is in her place and moves with perfect balance” (line 17 – 18). Then, in section 6, he praises the male form. What is the man? He is “action and power” (line 2), but additionally “The flush of the known universe is in him/…Knowledge becomes him” (line 3, line 7). But there is one thing he specifically praises the female body for – procreation. In lines 12 and 13 of section 5 of the same poem, he compares male-female sex to birth, and then praises the female body for being “…the gates of the body… the gates of the soul” (section 5 line 15). Male and female are both described as containing all qualities, but men are distinctly described as embodying action, power, knowledge, the entire known universe. So I have to ask, what besides the general “all qualities” does the woman embody? What besides the bodies and souls of others, which do not truly belong to her? “She is to conceive daughters as well as sons, and sons as well as daughters” (section 5 line 19) – she equally conceives – but I can’t help but notice that the primary clause of this line is “She is to conceive”, she is expected to conceive.
In sections 7 and 8, Whitman mentions the begetting of children again. A man is “…the father of those who shall be fathers in their turns,/In him the start of populous states and rich republics,/Of him countless immortal lives with countless embodiments and enjoyments” (section 7 lines 19 – 21). A woman shares similar characteristics, she is “…the teeming mother of mothers,/She is the bearer of them that shall grow and be mates to mothers” (section 8 lines 2 – 3). But… that’s it. Nothing about populous states, rich republics, embodiments and enjoyments in his description of the female role within procreation – only motherhood and mating. Now, you could argue that he doesn’t need to restate that women are also the start of populous states and whatnot. But Whitman loves his repetitions. So why did he leave those things out when describing how a woman’s role in procreation benefits the world? Why does she only create more procreators? Because of this, I can’t help reading women as portrayed as lesser than men in this poem.
Now, I’m not definitive about all this – maybe Whitman is biased like this towards the male body because he’s gay, maybe I’m that one friend who’s too woke. Just wanted to share some of what I thought about while reading parts of Children of Adam.
Luca’s CS for February 5th
So sorry I’m posting these so late, I was planning to write them yesterday but then I saw Iron Lung and it was all I could think about for the rest of the day…. anyway. Fun fact – did you know the acorus calamus plant, which this collection of poems is named for, contains psychoactive chemicals? Now you do! I wonder if Walt did…
Throughout these poems, Walt seems to be exploring a number of underlying themes. Something I picked up immediately in “Scented Herbage of My Breast” is the body-soul-nature collective we briefly talked about in class today, or rather the blurring of lines between each. What exactly are the plants Whitman is writing about here? What do they represent? They’re linked to his body, particularly his heart, in the title of the poem itself and in lines like “…O blossoms of my blood! I permit you to tell in your own way of the heart that is under you” (line 7). The body as nature, and nature as the body. “Roots and Leaves Themselves Alone” repeats this theme, but on a universal rather than personal scale – “Roots and leaves themselves alone are these/Scents brought to men and women from the wild woods and pond-side/Breast-sorrel and pinks of love, fingers that wind around tighter than vines” (lines 1 – 3). Here, the language used to describe the plants in line 3 clearly associates them with the body, but rather than being part of “the men and women,” they are brought to the people.
In “Scented Herbage of My Breast,” these plants are also connected to both cyclical renewal – “Every year you shall bloom again…” (line 5) – and death – “…you make me think of death,/Death is beautiful from you…” (lines 8 – 9).
Speaking of death, the way Whitman talks about it in these poems is really interesting. In “Scented Herbage of My Breast, the lines “…it is not for life I am chanting here my chant of lovers, I think it must be for death” (line 10) and “Through me shall the words be said to make death exhilarating” (line 25). The Great Poet speaks not only for America, nature, and whatever other conventions we’ve come to expect from Whitman – here, he explicitly establishes himself as speaking for death. Again I wonder, what exactly is this death? Is it literal, or representative of something more complex? The unique kind of love Calamus centers on has a surprising amount to do with this mysterious death. In “Whoever You Are Holding Me Now in Hand,” Whitman says that “thus touching you [a lover, presumably] would I silently sleep and be carried eternally” (line 26). Silently sleeping eternally certainly sounds like death, but what kind of death is inspired by the touch of a lover, and why? There are a couple other unusual death-related things I noticed throughout these poems but they may be more of a stretch, so I’ll leave them out of this particular post.
I could probably go on a lot longer about Calamus, but for now I’ll just briefly mention a few other repeated themes I noticed in case you want more to discuss or think about:
- Society, and what exists outside of it – particularly in the context of the homosocial (?) love these poems are about
- In a related vein, society/heteronormativity as a false reality or illusion, versus homosocial love as the true or transcendent reality (this one really interests me but I can’t quite wrap my head around it enough to write a constructive paragraph about it)
- American identity and the so-called “robust love”
- The juxtaposition of homosocial-ity and heteronormativity
Walt Whitman and Andy Wier
Throughout the trek that is reading “I celebrate myself”, its themes kept reminding me of the short story “The Egg” by Andy Weir.
https://www.galactanet.com/oneoff/theegg_mod.html
Something something “I am the universe and I am everyone and everything, and everyone and everything is me, and consciousness and existence are both plural and ultimately singular, and someday I (and by I, I mean everyone) will reach apotheosis…” I would articulate my thoughts on the connection between these two works more, but I am very tired.
Also… what drugs was Walt Whitman taking in 1855???? I have never read a poem that is simultaneously so horny and so esoteric.