This is my work for April 2nd

Poem 552 discusses a “Languor of the Life / More imminent than Pain”. According to Dickinson’s Lexicon, languor means “the empty feeling of sorrow” or “longing for a lost loved one.” I interpret this poem as a commentary on the suffering that comes with the absence of feeling. Dickinson says, “A Dimness like a Fog / Envelopes Consciousness – / As Mists – obliterate a Crag.” To me this describes the erasure of self when depression and numbness take over the mind. Not only is the speaker becoming absent, but they are also being hidden from the rest of the world. The third and fourth stanzas speak to the danger of this. Pain is normal to the surgeon, but if told that the “Creature lying there” “ceased to feel,” he will admit defeat to forces “Mightier than He.” The absence of sensation indicates that “Skill is late” and it’s now hopeless. All life has been disconnected, as suggested by Dickinson’s use of the word “Creature.” This word strips the patient back to just their biology, erasing the layers that make us human, just as the loss of self and feeling does. The final stanza continues this idea through metaphysical concepts. Dickinson writes, “A Mightier than He – / Has ministered before Him,” implying that human intervention is pointless. “There’s no Vitality” left to save once the “Soul / Has suffered all it can.”

After reading this poem, poem 588 stood out to me for the way both poems address suffering and pain, though they approach these experiences differently. In poem 552, suffering is linked to numbness and the erasure of self, while poem 588 portrays pain and the absence of feeling through the metaphor of the heart’s attempts to escape suffering. The heart asks for an “excuse from Pain,” a temporary relief from something it cannot ultimately avoid. This directly mirrors the numbness described in poem 552. When this is no longer effective, the heart turns to “those little Anodynes / That deaden suffering.” According to Dickinson’s Lexicon, anodynes are sources of relief or alleviation from emotional distress or grief; they’re also defined as medicines, opiates, and narcotics. These drugs cause effects similar to the emotional disconnection described in poem 552 as the “Fog [which] Envelops Consciousness”. Ultimately, both poems represent numbness as an insufficient solution and present death as the final rescue. In poem 552, this is through the loss of “Vitality,” while in poem 588, it is the heart’s “privilege to die.” This parallel reflects Dickinson’s view that death is liberty from life’s suffering and grants us eternal peace.

Who is Emily Dickinson?

In class on Tuesday, we discussed the poem in which Dickinson describes things that she does and does not want to be or do. This poem really left me thinking “who is Emily Dickinson?”. Given the nature of her life and the lack of personal information we have about her, besides the letters that she sent to others, it is interesting to get a deeper look into her own wants and desires beyond what we can see in the personality that she presents to others. I am interested to see what other details about her wants, desires, and personality we will get as we continue reading more of her poems, particularly as they move forward into later periods of her life.

The Importance of Dickinson’s Connection to her Work

When we were discussing Dickinson’s death/marriage poem on Thursday, something that came up was the fact that Dickinson didn’t really seem to be scared of death, so her writing about being scared of death, either in itself, through the metaphor of marriage, or as a metaphor for marriage, didn’t seem to make sense. Yet, does it matter if Dickinson can personally relate to the poetry she is writing? Or is poetry, in general, more about creating spaces for individuals to relate to one another, regardless of how the poet themselves relates? This question interests me specifically when thinking about Dickinson because she did not seem to have any interest in publishing her works. The only way that her work was spread was directly to another person by herself in her letters, which seems like it would take away the possibility for relatability between people beyond Dickinson. Does this mean that we shouldn’t view Dickinson’s work as possibly being relatable in ways beyond her own experiences, or could her poetry still be viewed that way even if it wasn’t her intention?

Whitman or Dickinson?

This is a very surface level thought, but it is still so jarring to me to compare the lengthy, 50-page poems we were reading from Whitman to the sometimes only 4-8 line poems from Dickinson. Which do you prefer? As of now, I think I prefer Dickinson because even though her poems are harder to understand, they feel more fun to read (sorry Whitman). Also, Dickinson is a woman, and I’m always going to choose a woman over a man (not sorry Whitman).